The Value of Your Peers' Feedback

Collage image generated with Wix Ai tool

Reflecting on my experience revising my instructional design document this week, I gained valuable insights from my peer's feedback. The concept of "peer review" in the United States education system, where learners critically evaluate each other's work in judgment-free spaces, was a novel and beneficial experience for me. Unlike my previous education in Colombia, where only teachers assessed the quality of my work, I found the peer review process an excellent tool to encourage students to contribute opinions in a collaborative and supportive manner.

While I recognize the expertise of teachers and their role as authority figures, I also acknowledge their human nature, which may introduce biases into their evaluations. Thus, allowing classmates to provide feedback creates an opportunity to develop critical and analytical learning skills for both the giver and the receiver of feedback.

Recently, I participated in a feedback activity for my graduate course in Technology-Based Learning Environments at UNT. The project under scrutiny was a design document for a course on the Canvas Learning Management System (LMS) platform. In an online learning environment, my classmate and I exchanged our design documents after the initial peer review by our professor, Dr. Kaplan-Rakowski, using track changes and comments in Word.

My classmate conducted a meticulous analysis of my work, offering corrections and suggesting areas for improvement in a professional and friendly tone. This feedback proved invaluable as it highlighted aspects of my design document that I might have overlooked and inspired me to explore alternative approaches to enhance the final deliverable. Consequently, I decided to incorporate additional learning activities and restructure my course project's learning goals and objectives. Following the feedback, I plan to review the grammar and flow of specific sections, as suggested by my classmate, to enhance the readability of the content.

The peer-review process also taught me the importance of offering opinions and suggestions professionally. While I embraced many of the proposed changes, I realized that not every suggestion needed to be implemented. Instead, the process is collaborative, aiming to bring a project to success. There were areas where my classmate suggested changes that, while valid, I believe still align with the plan and structure I envisioned for my project. For example, I find the chosen name and target audience suitable for the type of course I aim to create.

In conclusion, participating in a peer review activity has proven to be a rewarding learning experience. Constructive criticism is paramount for fostering collaborative learning in academic and higher education settings. I believe it would be beneficial to extend this practice beyond the educational sphere, such as incorporating constructive criticism and peer-review feedback sessions in the workplace. This approach could contribute to continuous improvement and professional development in various environments.